| 1 |
On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I interpreted 'reserved' as 'free to use' on |
| 7 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/UID_GID_Assignment |
| 8 |
> > Can you tweak it to someting other than 'reserved' so it would be clear? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> That's what the "Notes" column was intended for. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > I'll use 60001 .. 60999 / 61001 .. 61999. Is it free though? |
| 13 |
> > '60001..65533' claims to also be 'reserved' as well. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Debian is also using the range above 60000 for allocations that won't |
| 16 |
> fit into the low range. Theoretically, there is some overlap with |
| 17 |
> systemd dynamic users (61184..65519), but IIUC assigning other UIDs in |
| 18 |
> that range isn't a problem, as long as there are enough free IDs left. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Another question, the above are about 2000 users and 2000 groups. |
| 21 |
> Does that imply that we will eventually end up with 4000 packages |
| 22 |
> in acct-{user,group}? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Should be 2000 users, 2 groups. Worst case it's 2002 packages, yes. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Sergei |
Archives