Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Olivier Crete <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:38:58
Message-Id: 1162312455.4802.17.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees by Stuart Herbert
1 On Tue, 2006-31-10 at 17:02 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
2 > This leaves package maintainers in the situation that there are
3 > 'old'/'insecure'/<insert preferred adjective here> versions of
4 > packages that are hanging around only because arches have fallen
5 > behind. Package maintainers want to be able to remove these old
6 > versions, but currently cannot because of keywording-lag.
7 > [...]
8 > 3) ??
9
10 What about, package maintainers remove all of the other keywords from
11 said broken version and add a nasty ewarning message to the pkg_postinst
12 like "this version has a known security problem, dont use it, bitch to
13 your arch team if you're not happy"...
14
15 --
16 Olivier CrĂȘte
17 tester@g.o
18 Gentoo Developer
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list