Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Bob Thomas <gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu>
To: mcummings@××××××××.net
Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>, gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:30:03
Message-Id: 3DF8D29F.7030903@mail.gatech.edu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade by Michael Cummings
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Michael Cummings wrote:
5 | Let me step in for a sec. This is my fault (read: gentoo's perl guy atm)
6 |
7 | The unmasking of 5.8 was *mostly* an accident. The ebuild needs a touch
8 | up right now to assist you with fixing packages. There are still one or
9 | two upstream problems with perl 5.8 (that is, packages that use the
10 | libperl.so to compile against that aren't ready for 5.8 yet), and that I
11 | can't help. Really, the only reason to keep 5.8 in glass right this
12 | second is that there are other packages that your probably have
13 | installed that used the libperl.so to compile against when portage saw
14 | that you had perl, that need to be re-emerged. The list isn't as simple
15 | as "anything that deps perl," but it's pretty close, and once re-emerged
16 | everything is good again. For instance, vim, if it sees perl, will
17 | compile a portion against libperl.so and will break if you upgrade your
18 | perl on it. Re-emerging vim fixes the problem immediately.
19 |
20 | So the short of it is, *sorry about this*, the long of it is that
21 | perl-5.6.1 will be completely fixed (anyone who had problems with
22 | modules going to the wrong dirs will know what that means) and 5.8, once
23 | the post-install config is ready, will be ready for ~arch testing.
24 |
25 | *whew*
26 |
27 | That make any sense? Let me know,
28 |
29 | Mike
30 |
31 | On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 12:48:22PM -0500, Bob Thomas wrote:
32 |
33 |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
34 |>Hash: SHA1
35 |>
36 |>Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
37 |>| It is because perl 5.8.0 is masked. You could trying runing the
38 |>| unstable/testing version, ~.
39 |>|
40 |>| Tom Veldhouse
41 |>|
42 |>| ----- Original Message -----
43 |>| From: "Bob Thomas" <gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu>
44 |>| To: "gentoo-dev" <gentoo-dev@g.o>
45 |>| Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 6:32 PM
46 |>| Subject: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade
47 |>|
48 |>|
49 |>|
50 |>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
51 |>|>Hash: SHA1
52 |>|>
53 |>|>When I run emerge -up world I get the following:
54 |>|>
55 |>|>[ebuild UD] sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r7 [5.8.0-r3]
56 |>|>[ebuild UD] app-crypt/gnupg-1.0.7 [1.2.1-r0]
57 |>|>[ebuild UD] net-www/mozilla-1.0.1-r3 [1.2.1-r1]
58 |>|>
59 |>|>These are masked packages that I installed earlier today. These are not
60 |>|>the only masked packages that I currently have installed, but it's what
61 |>|>I've installed today. Is it a coincidence that these are packages that I
62 |>|>just installed (and there's something special about them), or could this
63 |>|>be something that recently changed in Portage (the "D" is new to me) ?
64 |>|>
65 |>|>- --
66 |>|>Robert Thomas
67 |>|>Georgia Institute of Technology
68 |>|>Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu
69 |>|>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
70 |>|>Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
71 |>|>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
72 |>|>
73 |>|>iD8DBQE999kgkRe6eFyQaRcRArkbAJ9DRYXuwqfk7qEke6hQaqs+GcgaZACffTn5
74 |>|>6BwCZ1XZl1R6lZPpKKKRulM=
75 |>|>=SAR7
76 |>|>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
77 |>|>
78 |>|>
79 |>|>--
80 |>|>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
81 |>|>
82 |>|>
83 |>|
84 |>|
85 |>|
86 |>| --
87 |>| gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
88 |>|
89 |>|
90 |>
91 |>It isn't masked on my box (in package.mask), it's a testing package
92 |>(~arch). I emerged the new nvidia drivers and now it wants me to
93 |>downgrade them too, and they're listed above perl.
94 |>
95 |>- --
96 |>Robert Thomas
97 |>Georgia Institute of Technology
98 |>Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu
99 |>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
100 |>Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
101 |>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
102 |>
103 |>iD8DBQE9+MvmkRe6eFyQaRcRAjoyAKCR8kckksNaPJKxr8kJ8GMSol0JWACeKzKV
104 |>rVzJl7RDV2d9SWRBIgdZ0vI=
105 |>=9YTI
106 |>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
107 |>
108 |>
109 |>--
110 |>gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
111 |
112 |
113 | --
114 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
115 |
116 |
117
118 Um, so, I need to go back to 5.6.1 then, right? I'm in the middle of
119 rebuilding everything right now (new CFLAGS). I hope I didn't mess
120 anything up by having 5.8 installed :-/
121
122 So what about all the other stuff (nVidia, Mozilla, . . .)? I understand
123 waht happened with perl (it's ok, really :-p), but how come every other
124 testing package I've merged recently shows up when I do a "emerge -up
125 world"? Is there a similar story behind all of those others? Right now
126 emerge -up world shows:
127
128 [ebuild UD] media-video/nvidia-kernel-1.0.3123-r2 [1.0.4191-r0]
129 [ebuild UD] media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.3123 [1.0.4191-r0]
130 [ebuild UD] sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r7 [5.8.0-r3]
131 [ebuild UD] net-www/mozilla-1.0.1-r3 [1.2.1-r1]
132 [ebuild UD] app-crypt/gnupg-1.0.7 [1.2.1-r0]
133
134 I'm not giving up those new nVidia drivers
135
136 - --
137 Robert Thomas
138 Georgia Institute of Technology
139 Email: gtg663h@×××××××××××.edu
140 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
141 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
142 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
143
144 iD8DBQE9+NKfkRe6eFyQaRcRAnrMAJ9rBWyAtTN7dws8h0xEDsZXt8WAOQCffsFK
145 D0+sABi2tnCks8AVVaYioWw=
146 =iU6q
147 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
148
149
150 --
151 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage wants to downgrade J Robert Ray <jrray@g.o>