1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 10/11/11 05:36, Alec Warner wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> 3) Maintainers (and upstreams) are not always responsive. The bug |
7 |
> was opened in February and wasn't really worked on until recently. |
8 |
> |
9 |
It is a bit of surprise all this talking for a bug that went |
10 |
unattended for 9 months isn't it? O:) It is like people want open bugs |
11 |
and rotten packages around :). |
12 |
|
13 |
> When you are making a treewide change like a lib upgrade you do |
14 |
> have a to pick a point where 'enough' people have upgraded and you |
15 |
> just break (or mask in this case) everything else. If the folks |
16 |
> want the package in the tree they can fix it; thats the whole point |
17 |
> of masking (providing a notification and a fix-it interval.) |
18 |
This is why the packages is masked now. But of course people don't |
19 |
bother reading masking messages and they think that masking == removal. |
20 |
|
21 |
- -- |
22 |
Regards, |
23 |
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 |
24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) |
26 |
|
27 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOk+70AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCWNYP/R5hptjfjUku8vutJ5ptTiXY |
28 |
HEf3N3rJtZmg6CgM1kLwRoGeCxiM1iiy7AC1chYa+hlgxx4iDYS3iMUaKaQRupZu |
29 |
PSLbZFWn06F7SzeujqGb5YdCBlF5Evoyswe/lxXlr60qyfyu2vCH+C3Ly8VughQp |
30 |
FafI096uWm3JlxbEW1R6Bvz+TtV37FSVDWx44Hqmu6IqTwuq70tfO3V5zOGjSePR |
31 |
4Af9RSK/t/+MU2f3Jn3M9dlSVJG1EzMjmLB5x3ItFANUU0kjQYe0rbz6ezpL0nb8 |
32 |
AWGIaHelLSLQowBICCUpmigVPoZx39oJIFMVmzqZTEOVkrjmxmeimPw3qR/oPyFn |
33 |
ySlFoVahr+IXGzh2jW+EKacVio4lPSelj19uWLY104wD2Y+S909OMXnFn2MhrPYx |
34 |
5RHvrMQEYXE3lb1AZxy4+Hf5up4LNZnTTwQ/IERUNqENIwJNTOxHtmGAiZxD+Jlb |
35 |
u2GXURnV3/zI5Dffvk3P/fQjFRCZukakmPkYh9K/pYCjjN7Q4n1d/XqKjk9neo46 |
36 |
PrfcO0PTxRYvETq/JOB9YORT9+n4oL0RVp7qNgaZEQII/xxJDxIy55DXiPAHoTjU |
37 |
ZumWmmzUiK9ceJPHiVKU5tNPImv7n6pNvzuiM96qMMkyydzd+TnGLSbqo+6e56qY |
38 |
AH/tWodh81mNCuc+/szf |
39 |
=BPvB |
40 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |