Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Eric Noack <eric.noack@×××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc3.2.2 ate portage and others
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:24:52
Message-Id: 20030227181311.3eade8cc.eric.noack@gmx.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc3.2.2 ate portage and others by Mark Gordon
1 Am Thu, 27 Feb 2003 16:10:57 +0000
2 schrieb Mark Gordon <mark.gt@×××××××××××××××.uk>:
3
4 > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:54:41 +0100
5 > Ingo Krabbe <i.krabbe@×××××.net> wrote:
6 >
7 >
8 > Doing an
9 >
10 > # env-update
11 >
12 > as root should fix it.
13 >
14
15 he lol, i had this bug, too
16
17 its already in bugs.gentoo.org, bug #15288
18
19 and env-update wont work until further workarounds doe to
20 python needing libstdc++.so.5 >:>>>>
21
22
23 > Failing that, as root try the following
24 >
25 > # gcc-config --list-profiles
26 > which will tell you which gcc version you have, then
27 > # gcc-config <version reported above>
28 > # env-update
29 > --
30
31 i think gcc-config not working is what causes the bug in the first,
32 so i would be really interested in what happens here ;-)
33
34
35
36 > Mark Gordon
37 > Paid to be a Geek & a Senior Software Developer
38 > Currently looking for a new job commutable from Slough, Berks, U.K.
39 > Although my email address says spamtrap, it is real and I read it.
40 >
41 > --
42 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
43 >
44
45 Eric >:>>>>>
46
47 --
48 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc3.2.2 ate portage and others oford <oford@×××.net>