| 1 |
All, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I have been working on the version bump for sys-process/runit [1]. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Service directories will be stored in /etc/sv; think of this as being |
| 6 |
like /etc/init.d. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Once this is done, there are two suggested ways of linking to the |
| 9 |
service directories you want to monitor. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
The first is to make a directory, /etc/service, which contains symlinks |
| 12 |
to all of the services you want to monitor. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The second way is to build a structure under /etc/runit/runsvdir that |
| 15 |
contains multiple runlevels and link /etc/service to that structure [2]. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
All of this is completely reconfigurable by the user; I'm just wondering |
| 18 |
what the default should be. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
We are using method 2 currently, but with only one runlevel by default, |
| 21 |
so my thought is we should go to method one by default and point people |
| 22 |
to the documentation if they want to change it. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Another reason I am suggesting method one by default is it will make |
| 25 |
things easier if people want to run runit as a supervisor under another |
| 26 |
init system. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Does anyone have any comments on that approach? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks, |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
William |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=522786 |
| 35 |
[2] http://www.smarden.org/runit/runlevels.html |
Archives