| 1 |
Le mercredi 21 août 2013 à 12:15 +0800, Ben de Groot a écrit : |
| 2 |
> On 21 August 2013 07:36, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Le mardi 20 août 2013 à 17:31 +0400, Sergey Popov a écrit : |
| 4 |
> >> 16.08.2013 21:15, hasufell пишет: |
| 5 |
> >> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=420493 |
| 6 |
> >> > |
| 7 |
> >> > gtk2 and gtk3 useflags are discouraged and should only be used in |
| 8 |
> >> > special cases |
| 9 |
> >> > |
| 10 |
> >> > file a bug for those if there is not one already |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> What's about maintainer wish to support both of toolkits? I have dropped |
| 13 |
> >> GTK2 support in gtkdiskfree[1], but it seems that proxied maintainer |
| 14 |
> >> will quit if i keep things that way :-/ |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > The upstream maintainer is free to support both toolkits if he wishes to |
| 17 |
> > do so, but we strongly recommend to only select one slot for |
| 18 |
> > applications in gentoo tree, the one which works best for the |
| 19 |
> > application. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > -- |
| 22 |
> > Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 23 |
> > Gentoo |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> When upstream supports both, and the maintainer wishes to do so as |
| 26 |
> well, I would strongly recommend to support both, so that end-users |
| 27 |
> can make their own choices. Some may wish to use the applications in a |
| 28 |
> light-weight gtk2-only environment such as LXDE. As long as gtk+:2 is |
| 29 |
> supported in the tree, I don't see why we should artificially restrict |
| 30 |
> such choices for our users. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
The reasons are enumerated on the wiki and are just a summary of the |
| 33 |
older thread where this was discussed. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Of course, since there is no body to impose such rules, you are free to |
| 36 |
go against gnome team self imposed policy and recommendation. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
| 40 |
Gentoo |
Archives