| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Hi everyone, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Bug #161045 [1] requests that portage support RESTRICT=sandbox. |
| 7 |
This is certainly a valid request but a user may wish to reject a |
| 8 |
package based on certain questionable values of RESTRICT. Examples |
| 9 |
other than sandbox incude unattended [2] and userpriv [3]. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I suggest that we add support for a new incremental variable called |
| 12 |
ACCEPT_RESTRICT so that a user can accept or reject restrictions. |
| 13 |
Much like package.keywords, we can also have a package.restrict file |
| 14 |
located in /etc/portage for per-package settings. Thoughts? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161045 |
| 17 |
[2] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0052.html |
| 18 |
[3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159876 |
| 19 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
iD8DBQFFpBot/ejvha5XGaMRApz/AJ9EMGSFKUwnZwzYo1TbimLT19hSWQCgqdRD |
| 23 |
1cnMmOvVr3/bejMrR6Og+nY= |
| 24 |
=G2JM |
| 25 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives