Archives
Archives
| From: | Toby Dickenson <tdickenson@××××××××××××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>, gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. | ||
| Date: | Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:32:29 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200403231432.24722.tdickenson@devmail.geminidataloggers.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. by Paul de Vrieze |
||
| 1 | On Tuesday 23 March 2004 13:12, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | <snip alot of good stuff> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > - As the checking is done post-rsync there is no problem with infrequent |
| 6 | > rsync-ing. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Im not sure what infrequent rsyncing problem you are avoiding here, but |
| 9 | relying *only* on a post-rsync check seems dangerous. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | We certainly need to be careful about what happens if portage is interrupted |
| 12 | before this full check is complete. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Toby Dickenson |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] 2004.1 will not include a secure portage. | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |