Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: genkernel <genkernel@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2015 13:17:19
Message-Id: 1421500627.29756.7.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about by Patrick Lauer
1 El sáb, 17-01-2015 a las 19:35 +0800, Patrick Lauer escribió:
2 [...]
3 > * stable genkernel still doesn't enable all useful kernel features
4 > e.g. accounting statistics are absent, so iotop doesn't work ootb
5 > See for example #442936 (from 2012 ?!)
6 > Fix: Stable newer versions
7 >
8
9 I see there isn't even any stable bug report for that, is anyone major
10 blocking newer versions to be stabilized?
11
12 > * AutoRepoman catches issues, but no one but me seems to care
13 > Fix: Remind people of http://packages.gentooexperimental.org/repoman-current-issues.txt
14 > Fix: Make it yell louder? It currently reports on IRC to #gentoo-{bugs,qa}
15 >
16
17 Maybe some warnings could be raised to fatal to prevent to commit them
18 (that shouldn't be a problem as that are usually easy to fix problems).
19 For example, the dodoc "LICENSE" stuff and WANT_AUTOCONF=latest
20
21 > * mail archives have been broken since 2012
22 > Fix: get infra to either fix it, or provide enough information that it can
23 > be fixed. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424647#c27
24 >
25
26 Is there any advantage of setting them up again instead of relying on
27 other existing external resources? :/