| 1 |
Eldad Zack wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey Everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I'd like some feedback about a little tool I've whipped up, which checks the |
| 5 |
> last stable/unstable ebuild per arch. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Running it in snort's directory, for example, yields this result: |
| 8 |
> snort-2.0.6: sparc |
| 9 |
> snort-2.1.2: |
| 10 |
> snort-2.1.3: x86 |
| 11 |
> snort-2.2.0: ~amd64 ~x86 ~ppc ~sparc -alpha |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Get it while it's hot: http://dev.gentoo.org/~eldad/earch/earch |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Now... if this tool also checked profiles to see which versions could be |
| 17 |
safely removed -THAT- would be sexy. Some profiles mask to a specific |
| 18 |
version that may or may not be the latest keyworded version in |
| 19 |
portage... which certainly makes making sure you dont remove something |
| 20 |
needed difficult. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
...i think that's the whole reason why we can measure the size of |
| 23 |
sys-devel/binutils in MEGS. i know i'm kinda afraid to just start |
| 24 |
ripping ebuilds out of there... though i seriously need to at some point. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Travis Tilley |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives