1 |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:25 PM, M. J. Everitt <m.j.everitt@×××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 15/12/17 01:17, R0b0t1 wrote (excerpted): |
3 |
>> I'm not trying to be confrontational, but asserting an opinion is |
4 |
>> correct without explaining why that it is so isn't really conducive to |
5 |
>> arriving at the truth. I understand not wanting to answer if I am |
6 |
>> completely clueless, and would like to apologize in advance for |
7 |
>> bothering the developers. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> I am not very smart, sir. |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>> Cheers, |
12 |
>> R0b0t1 |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> With all due respect, Gentoo is not renowned for spoon-feeding ... |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
That is exactly right, sir! I am trying my best to not impose on the |
18 |
goodwill of the mailing list participants. At the same time, I feel |
19 |
like I could understand an explanation if one was offered. If any |
20 |
person's judgement suggests otherwise, however, surely they are |
21 |
correct and no time should be wasted on such a person as myself. |
22 |
|
23 |
> Returning to the topic in hand, two key points strike out at me:- |
24 |
> |
25 |
> 1) Gentoo isn't really interested in having a 'stable' tree or it would |
26 |
> already be happening. As such, why not cut the Gordian knot, declare |
27 |
> that this is not something that will happen [soon] and let users make |
28 |
> their own choices. The [majority of] developers already seem to have ... |
29 |
> |
30 |
|
31 |
This is one of the valid conclusions, especially if the criteria for |
32 |
stable packages are not changed. |
33 |
|
34 |
> 2) Whilst there has yet another fine bike-shed emerged on the subject, I |
35 |
> have only seen one volunteer willing or capable to actually take on |
36 |
> implementation of anything that has been discussed on this thread. As |
37 |
> such, you can talk all you like .. nothing will happen until somebody |
38 |
> actually *does* something .. For all the hating, I will duly credit |
39 |
> mgorny for producing a consistent quantity of commits across the board |
40 |
> in Gentoo, and whilst you may not agree with all his bitching (for want |
41 |
> of a better term) at least he can stand and say "well at least I did |
42 |
> *something* about it, whether You like it or not ...". |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Damnit, there's another $2 from me .. my apologies. |
45 |
> |
46 |
|
47 |
I did some initial work trying to fix issues with erlang and rebar, |
48 |
but I was unable to duplicate the errors due to how tinderboxes work. |
49 |
A buildbot may not be any more repeatable depending on how it is set |
50 |
up. Before any work is done I think the problem could be better |
51 |
characterized, but then you have another long mailing list discussion |
52 |
that people may or may not be willing to read. People want to do |
53 |
something, not think about doing something. |
54 |
|
55 |
In a lot of times that is the better option, even. But not always. |
56 |
|
57 |
Cheers, |
58 |
R0b0t1 |