| 1 |
It seems that by default, Kernel 2.4.18 is being built and yet everyone |
| 2 |
seems to be advising to downgrade to 2.4.17. I personally think that as |
| 3 |
you go to release 1.0, we should have instructions for building the latest |
| 4 |
*stable* release of the kernel rather than grabbing the latest experimental |
| 5 |
kernel (or whatever y'all call 2.4.18)...athough I am not so sure about: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
ebuild /usr/portage/sys-kernel/linux-source/linux-sources-2.4.17.rc5.ebuild |
| 8 |
merge |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
...as a cmd to document in install instructs. Maybe a better option is to |
| 11 |
roll up the first four commands from Code Listing 24 (First code listing of |
| 12 |
"Installing the Kernel and Sys logger") into a script that queries the |
| 13 |
directories under sys-kernel and prompts user to pick which version to ebuild. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Any thoughts? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Michael |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
"All things should be as simple as possible, but no simpler" -- Albert Einstein |
Archives