From: | Thomas Anderson <gentoofan23@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask | ||
Date: | Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:59:03 | ||
Message-Id: | 20081004111520.GA3517@spoc.mpa.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask by Ryan Hill |
1 | On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:44:10PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
2 | > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200 |
3 | > Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o> wrote: |
4 | > |
5 | > > Please people, |
6 | > > |
7 | > > |
8 | > > if you want to get something tested, then don't mask it. |
9 | > |
10 | > So, no, I'll continue using package.mask for testing just |
11 | > as it always has been. Sorry. |
12 | |
13 | ++, especially on unleashing broken stuff to users. |