| 1 |
On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct , Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: |
| 3 |
> > Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild |
| 6 |
> > >> |
| 7 |
> > >> file : |
| 8 |
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r |
| 9 |
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: |
| 10 |
> > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r |
| 11 |
> > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain |
| 12 |
> > >> |
| 13 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" |
| 14 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" |
| 15 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" |
| 16 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" |
| 17 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" |
| 18 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" |
| 19 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" |
| 20 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" |
| 21 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" |
| 22 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" |
| 23 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" |
| 24 |
> > >> |
| 25 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" |
| 26 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" |
| 27 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" |
| 28 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" |
| 29 |
> > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" |
| 30 |
> > > |
| 31 |
> > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, |
| 32 |
> > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV |
| 33 |
> > > directory. |
| 34 |
> > |
| 35 |
> > dev-zero? |
| 36 |
> Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while |
| 37 |
> the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be |
| 38 |
> separated. |
| 39 |
> And I don't see any reason to start renaming now. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ... |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Thanks, |
| 44 |
Donnie |
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives