Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From:	Luke-Jr <luke-jr@g.o>
To:	Nate Duehr <nate@××××××××.com>, Jason Wever <weeve@g.o>
Cc:	gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject:	Re: [gentoo-dev] preference concerns over "gentoo-ization" of packages
Date:	Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:10:00
Message-Id:	`200309282209.57504.luke-jr@gentoo.org`
In Reply to:	Re: [gentoo-dev] preference concerns over "gentoo-ization" of packages by Nate Duehr

1	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2	Hash: SHA1
3
4	On Sunday 28 September 2003 09:42 pm, Nate Duehr wrote:
5	> I don't know if this type of customization is the type of thing you guys
6	> are discussing
7	I think the discussion is about ebuilds which add features (a non-current
8	bittorrent ebuild adds a peer-display thing) or change art (such as changing
9	KDE/GNOME to have Gentoo icons, perhaps). Things which do not change the
10	software's actual functionality should be fine on any system...
11	- --
12	Luke-Jr
13	Developer, Gentoo Linux
14	http://www.gentoo.org/
15	-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
16	Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
17
18	iD8DBQE/d1wwZl/BHdU+lYMRAoZ4AJ9op+6L1vobFzRtVcdWFgWLKkeH8wCgjFfr
19	qktZneNT6/ABNotb4c50aS8=
20	=cdei
21	-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
22
23
24	--
25	gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list