1 |
tis 2001-10-09 klockan 17.15 skrev Dan Armak: |
2 |
> Followup: |
3 |
|
4 |
Just one thought, imho a solution to this would be to put qt2 in |
5 |
x11-libs/qt-x11 and qt3 in x11-libs/qt3-x11. This would make sense and |
6 |
is already used in portage for packages which aren't the same over major |
7 |
releases (like imlib, glide). I think this scheme would be good in the |
8 |
way that it won't make users think that qt3 and qt2 can be swapped for |
9 |
each other. |
10 |
|
11 |
This would solve the troubles you have here (even if we would like to |
12 |
have this feature eventually anyway) but in this case I would think that |
13 |
using different names for the packages would be good (aswell as using |
14 |
gtk2 or something for Gtk+ 2.0) |
15 |
|
16 |
Regards, |
17 |
Mikael Hallendal |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
|
21 |
Mikael Hallendal |
22 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader |
23 |
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden |