| 1 |
On 08/07/2016 10:37 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: |
| 3 |
>> [...] |
| 4 |
>> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that |
| 5 |
>> contains |
| 6 |
>> all the subprojects, no? |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way... |
| 10 |
> because freedesktop-bugs was behaving exactly in that way and, during |
| 11 |
> the transition, it was agreed to stop using that and simply CC the |
| 12 |
> right projects when needed :/ |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> From my point of view we should simply kill that "Desktop" project as |
| 15 |
> it serves no purpose and CC the relevant projects when needed, as I |
| 16 |
> don't recall many cases of the old freedesktop-bugs behaving in the way |
| 17 |
> you are suggesting (involving *all* desktop related projects in the bug |
| 18 |
> reports). On the other hand it was ending up with most people under the |
| 19 |
> subprojects simply ignoring the bug reports assigned to freedesktop- |
| 20 |
> bugs |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Well, if no other DEs want it, I say go for it. Your description of the |
| 24 |
old way was before my time working on MATE, I think. Where does that |
| 25 |
place the DEs going forward? Subprojects of The root node, or something |
| 26 |
else? |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives