| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
[cut] |
| 3 |
> HAHAHAHAHA... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Anyway, though spyderous was joking somewhat, he does have a point. We |
| 6 |
> really have no reason to produce one as part of the regular releases. I |
| 7 |
> have thought about making one, just for kicks. The primary reason for |
| 8 |
> not doing one is that SystemRescueCD already does this quite well. This |
| 9 |
> is a niche where someone else has built on Gentoo's work and has come up |
| 10 |
> with a unique and usable product. While I have no problem with someone |
| 11 |
> else within the Gentoo project using catalyst for this task, I don't see |
| 12 |
> a reason for one as part of the official releases. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Sysrescuecd works only on x86, the ppc version is in beta from months |
| 16 |
and months and it doesn't work with a network backup solution like |
| 17 |
bacula or something similar (FYI projects like qtparted are officially |
| 18 |
death). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And I'm agree with many users that want a recovery solution integrated |
| 21 |
with the "install disk". |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Christian |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives