| 1 |
On 17/07/14 21:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> I guess we'll have to wait until vapier's back to get it done, tho.. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
imlib2 is basically normal autotools based package, there is no need to |
| 8 |
tie it to this specific |
| 9 |
eclass |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
it should be extremely trivial to revision bump it to use normal eutils, |
| 12 |
autotools, econf, emake |
| 13 |
and so forth |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
the only reason it's tied to this specific eclass is historical reasons |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
i really can't see anyone objecting the conversion at this time |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- samuli |
Archives