| 1 |
For simple translations? No. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
For translations that span the same bredth (old version checking is |
| 4 |
probably going to be fairly needed if we used xml as a main version, |
| 5 |
and all other pretifying stuff is necessary. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
On 11/4/05, Jan Kundrát <jkt@g.o> wrote: |
| 8 |
> On Friday 04 of November 2005 19:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 9 |
> > On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:26:28 +0100 Xavier Neys <neysx@g.o> wrote: |
| 10 |
> > | > Oh? Our GuideXML to HTML conversion is thousands of lines of code... |
| 11 |
> > | |
| 12 |
> > | Plain wrong, but you have always made it clear that you are not only |
| 13 |
> > | biased against XML for anything, but also very much XML challenged. |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > Run a wc -l on guide.xsl sometime. Either wc is lying or that alone is |
| 16 |
> > thousands of lines of code. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Run a `less` or `gvim` or anything which actually displays the contents of the |
| 19 |
> file. Are you sure that checking for obsoleted translations, highlighting |
| 20 |
> top-page links and other stuff is really required for simple transformations? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> WKR, |
| 23 |
> -jkt |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> -- |
| 26 |
> cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives