1 |
El dom, 18-03-2012 a las 18:01 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
2 |
> El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:21 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
3 |
> > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 21:15 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
4 |
> > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 22:02 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: |
5 |
> > > > On 03/09/2012 09:48 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
6 |
> > > > > El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: |
7 |
> > > > >> On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 |
8 |
> > > > >> Pacho Ramos<pacho@g.o> wrote: |
9 |
> > > > >> |
10 |
> > > > >>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
11 |
> > > > >>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
12 |
> > > > >>>>> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
13 |
> > > > >>>>>> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like |
14 |
> > > > >>>>>> herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think |
15 |
> > > > >>>>>> we should drop that herds and move their packages to |
16 |
> > > > >>>>>> maintainer-needed in a week or so. |
17 |
> > > > >>>>>> |
18 |
> > > > >>>>>> What do you think? |
19 |
> > > > >>>>>> |
20 |
> > > > >>>>> |
21 |
> > > > >>>>> The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( |
22 |
> > > > >>>> |
23 |
> > > > >>>> and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now |
24 |
> > > > >>> |
25 |
> > > > >>> Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: |
26 |
> > > > >>> - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and |
27 |
> > > > >>> reflect reality) |
28 |
> > > > >>> - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports |
29 |
> > > > >>> |
30 |
> > > > >>> The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages |
31 |
> > > > >>> to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want |
32 |
> > > > >> |
33 |
> > > > >> For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, |
34 |
> > > > >> removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping |
35 |
> > > > >> the herd. |
36 |
> > > > >> |
37 |
> > > > > |
38 |
> > > > > OK but, what about the rest? ;) |
39 |
> > > > |
40 |
> > > > Please leave at least media-optical@ be as it is. Changing it doesn't |
41 |
> > > > make any sense. |
42 |
> > > > |
43 |
> > > > |
44 |
> > > |
45 |
> > > Well, the idea would be to get their bugs assigned to maintainer-needed |
46 |
> > > and media-optical CCed if somebody wants to take that stuff someday, it |
47 |
> > > would reflect better reality as, currently, their bugs are being |
48 |
> > > assigned to an empty herd (yes, xarthisius (I think he was in alias but |
49 |
> > > not officially in herd last time I checked, anyway it's only one |
50 |
> > > example, nothing personal against him of course :)). What will occur |
51 |
> > > when he simply drops his mail from alias as he never wanted to be a |
52 |
> > > member of that herd? What would occur if he only wants to maintain some |
53 |
> > > packages but others are getting ignored? |
54 |
> > > |
55 |
> > > The idea to get them moved to "orphan" is to reflect reality and, that |
56 |
> > > way, try to get developers (or users willing to proxy maintain them) |
57 |
> > > involved on exact apps they really want to keep maintained. |
58 |
> > |
59 |
> > As talked just now with Samuli, he added him to media-optical (both, to |
60 |
> > alias and herds.xml) and then, this no longer applies to media-optical |
61 |
> > obviously ;) |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> |
64 |
> Will then do the following: |
65 |
> - Add a <maintainer> tag to their metadatas to get bugs assigned to |
66 |
> maintainer-needed |
67 |
> - Keep herd to get it CCed (like was done some weeks ago with openoffice |
68 |
> herd) |
69 |
> |
70 |
> This applies to "sgml" and "text-markup" since media-optical is active |
71 |
> again and looks like net-zope packages will go away soon |
72 |
> |
73 |
|
74 |
Finally, only sgml is inside this case as it contains a lot of packages: |
75 |
app-doc/halibut |
76 |
app-emacs/nxml-mode |
77 |
app-emacs/psgml |
78 |
app-office/passepartout |
79 |
app-text/asciidoc |
80 |
app-text/build-docbook-catalog |
81 |
app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets |
82 |
app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd |
83 |
app-text/docbook-sgml-utils |
84 |
app-text/docbook-sgml |
85 |
app-text/docbook-xml-dtd |
86 |
app-text/docbook-xml-simple-dtd |
87 |
app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets |
88 |
app-text/docbook2X |
89 |
app-text/gentoo-guide-xml-dtd |
90 |
app-text/gnome-doc-utils |
91 |
app-text/grutatxt |
92 |
app-text/highlight |
93 |
app-text/html-xml-utils |
94 |
app-text/html2text |
95 |
app-text/html401 |
96 |
app-text/htmlrecode |
97 |
app-text/htmltidy |
98 |
app-text/linuxdoc-tools |
99 |
app-text/openjade |
100 |
app-text/opensp |
101 |
app-text/robodoc |
102 |
app-text/sablotron |
103 |
app-text/scrollkeeper-dtd |
104 |
app-text/scrollkeeper |
105 |
app-text/sgml-common |
106 |
app-text/sgmltools-lite |
107 |
app-text/sgrep |
108 |
app-text/txt2tags |
109 |
app-text/webgen |
110 |
app-text/xhtml1 |
111 |
app-text/xml2 |
112 |
app-text/xml2doc |
113 |
app-text/xmlformat |
114 |
app-text/xmlstarlet |
115 |
app-text/xmlto |
116 |
dev-ruby/xml-simple |
117 |
www-client/htmlview |
118 |
|
119 |
Is anyone willing to join the herd? If not, maybe somebody could take a |
120 |
few packages if they want to take care of only a set of them and not all |
121 |
the beast :-/ |