| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 03:52:08PM -0400, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 15:30:03 -0400 Chris Gianelloni |
| 5 |
> ><wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> >| On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 19:44 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> >| > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:36:16 -0500 Brian Jackson <iggy@g.o> |
| 8 |
> >| > wrote: |
| 9 |
> >| > | > ${CATEGORY}/${PN}:${SLOT}. |
| 10 |
> >| > | |
| 11 |
> >| > | I thought we were eventually going to use that format to specify |
| 12 |
> >| > | deps with specific USE set. |
| 13 |
> >| > |
| 14 |
> >| > That's [use]. |
| 15 |
> >| |
| 16 |
> >| I assume it is really [list of use] right? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> >I think cat/pkg:slot[foo][-bar][baz] or opcat/pkg-ver:slot[foo][-bar] |
| 19 |
> >was what was decided upon. That's how paludis does it, but it's easy |
| 20 |
> >enough to tweak if people prefer something else... |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> What's the point of all the square brackets? Is there some benefit over |
| 23 |
> just [foo -bar baz]? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Been awhile, but the original syntax being pushed was |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
cat/pkg:slot1,slot2 |
| 28 |
cat/pkg[use1_on,-use2_off,-use3_on] |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Somewhat prefer the spaces in use rather then commas personally also, |
| 31 |
but implemented the syntax I recalled. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
~harring |
Archives