1 |
OK, enough has been said about the current problems that some people |
2 |
have with GLEP 41. I'm not going to belabor that. Instead, I'm going to |
3 |
ask for one of three changes. What I object to most strongly is the notion |
4 |
that we're classifying devs based on their relative worth to the project |
5 |
and assigning them email addresses accordingly. Some folks will remember |
6 |
far back enough to when we had developers, senior developers, etc. and the |
7 |
problems that that caused. I don't want to see the same thing happen here. |
8 |
|
9 |
So, could we please make one of the following three changes to GLEP 41: |
10 |
|
11 |
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether |
12 |
|
13 |
I don't see what benefit this provides, to be honest. It's not much of a |
14 |
spiff and if someone is signing up to help with testing just for the |
15 |
email address, they're not here for the right reasons anyway. |
16 |
|
17 |
* Change @subdomain.gentoo.org to @gentoo.org. |
18 |
|
19 |
If we want to give them a spiff in recognition of their contribution to |
20 |
the project, give them the real thing. We do this today for any number |
21 |
of other non-developer groups, including GWN translators, documentation |
22 |
translators, etc. |
23 |
|
24 |
* Create an entirely new domain |
25 |
|
26 |
This is my least favorite option, but one that I offer as a way to try |
27 |
and compromise on all of this. I still think this segregates people, but |
28 |
in a much less discriminatory fashion. Additionally, with a new domain, |
29 |
we could open it up to a much broader audience. (offering email |
30 |
addresses to folks who donate in other ways -- financially, hardware, |
31 |
bandwidth, etc.) This may seem largely like a matter of semantics and I |
32 |
guess it is. However, this whole disagreement is largely about |
33 |
perception anyway and a separate domain just seems less disagreeable to |
34 |
me. |
35 |
|
36 |
--kurt |