| 1 |
On Thursday 10 March 2005 01:46, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 23:56 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Isn't profiles.desc just a list of *default* profiles though? We want a |
| 4 |
> > list of all valid profiles. So I think we should either extend |
| 5 |
> > profiles.desc to contain all valid profiles, or add a new file. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Either way would be fine by me, but portage would have to be modified to |
| 8 |
> allow for multiple profiles to be listed per arch in profiles.desc |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It won't break anything if that's what you're worried about. The only thing |
| 11 |
that uses profiles.desc is repoman, which can "handle" multiple profiles |
| 12 |
listed. ... I just found that all duplicates have been removed from |
| 13 |
profiles.desc. I guess people don't like noise. ;) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Okay. For the time being, there's a two things that can be done with repoman. |
| 16 |
It could print out a table of the profiles it will use for scanning or add |
| 17 |
the profile that was checked against into the arch-based failure message. |
| 18 |
What do you think? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives