From: | Daniel Black <dragonheart@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) | ||
Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:04:24 | ||
Message-Id: | 201006271102.59463.dragonheart@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] CAcert certificate distribution license to third parties (i.e. distributors like gentoo) by Daniel Black |
1 | On Sunday 13 December 2009 22:44:05 Daniel Black wrote: |
2 | > Recently this got produced as a draft license for parties distributing |
3 | > CAcert's root certificate(s) (like us). |
4 | > |
5 | > https://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/3PVDisclaimerAndLicence.h |
6 | > tml |
7 | > |
8 | > This is still in draft hasn't been discussed in CAcert's policy group yet. |
9 | > |
10 | > If you want to follow/contribute to this discussion look for a post to the |
11 | > policy list soon. |
12 | > https://lists.cacert.org/wws/info/cacert-policy |
13 | > |
14 | > I make no inferences good or bad about this. Mainly because I'm writing |
15 | > this with a headache. |
16 | > |
17 | > Cheers, |
18 | > |
19 | > Daniel |
20 | |
21 | Recently Sasha from Fedora has proposed CAcert's root distribution license as |
22 | CC-ND. This avoids many complications of the draft proposal above. |
23 | |
24 | By joining the list you can vote for it. |
25 | |
26 | the proposal: |
27 | https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-policy/2010-06/msg00151.html |
28 | |
29 | Once registered on this site there is a "send to (your email)" link on the top |
30 | right to preserve threading. |
31 | |
32 | ref: http://spreitzer.name/set-the-cacert-root-certificates-free |
33 | |
34 | Daniel |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |