1 |
Dnia 2013-08-05, o godz. 12:33:45 |
2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> This is a friendly reminder. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> I've found the tree again to have dependencies like: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> dev-libs/openssl:= |
9 |
> virtual/jpeg:= |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Neither of which are correct, since dev-libs/openssl has SLOT="0" and |
12 |
> SLOT="0.9.8" and virtual/jpeg has SLOT="0" and SLOT="62". |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Need to pull in the SLOT that installs headers: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> dev-libs/openssl:0= |
17 |
> virtual/jpeg:0= |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Same logic applies to any package with also "binary-only SLOTs" that |
20 |
> install libfoobar.so.1 and nothing else. |
21 |
|
22 |
Sounds like it's easy to miss that someone added binary-only SLOTs |
23 |
to a package. Is there anything we can do to improve this? |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Best regards, |
27 |
Michał Górny |