Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 15:56:52
Message-Id: 861427b9ce91493df222801938bfd9f6@webmail.jolexa.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-misc/blogtk: blogtk-1.0.ebuild by Alexis Ballier
1 On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:17:41 -0300, Alexis Ballier wrote:
2
3 > Good luck if you want to fix these "issues", I'm pretty sure there
4 > are
5 > hundreds of such warnings in the tree.
6
7 You mean thousands? There is no real reason to fix these repoman
8 "warnings" in the name of "qa" ;) Upon commit of an actual worthwhile
9 change, the header will be updated automatically. No one needs to
10 manually update the header when they commit, I guess that wasn't the
11 case in the past because I see the blogtk header had an older date the
12 eva's last commit to it. meh, commit stats ftw!
13
14 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2009 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
15 5449
16 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2008 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
17 2776
18 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
19 1471
20 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2006 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
21 592
22 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
23 313
24 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2004 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
25 38
26 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2003 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
27 0
28 % qgrep -H "Copyright 1999-2002 Gentoo Foundation" |wc -l
29 0