Archives
Archives
| From: | Ali-Reza Anghaie <ali@×××××××××××.com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... |
| Date: | Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:21:54 |
| Message-Id: | 1013908809.1459.59.camel@damascus.packetknife.com |
| 1 | Like I suspected there was already something similar but I hadn't found |
| 2 | it before. So the files/{digests} is part of the equation. And from at |
| 3 | least one rip in #gentoo it seems signing the packages seems silly to |
| 4 | some... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Anyhow, thanks... -Ali |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | OpenPGP key 53F7FF5F |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | I, the above, promise to use as many global variables, magic |
| 12 | numbers, gotos, and longjumps as I can, in order to make my |
| 13 | application code appear more magical. |
| 14 | -- (My friend JB) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... | Daniel Mettler <mettlerd@×××××××××.ch> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] RE: Portage package security model... | Nils Ohlmeier <lists@××××××××.de> |