| 1 |
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:56 +0000, Stephen Bennett wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 02:20:48 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > The EAPI=0 document was supposed to be a QA project. What it is now, |
| 6 |
> > I have no idea. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> A QA subproject which has not yet released a public draft. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Now, yes. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> > We asked for a specification. If the PMS |
| 13 |
> > team is unable or unwilling to provide us with what we asked under |
| 14 |
> > the terms we asked for it |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> We're working to provide it. So far, I haven't been asked for it under |
| 17 |
> any particular terms other than "at some point in the future, and we |
| 18 |
> realise that it will take a while to finish". |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yes. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
What we want to discuss is a possible timeline for completion, and what |
| 23 |
resources you may need to get it done within the agreed timeline. |
| 24 |
Notice that I used timeline, instead of deadline. It was done on |
| 25 |
purpose really just to shut people the hell up. We're not out to get |
| 26 |
anybody, we're just wanting to make sure we're all on track and moving |
| 27 |
forward. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 31 |
Release Engineering Strategic Lead |
| 32 |
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams |
| 33 |
Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee |
| 34 |
Gentoo Foundation |
Archives