1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 10:14 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> |
6 |
>>Uh, I did not expect such a response. I personally have a whole bunch of |
7 |
>>collisions on my system, most of which man pages. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>http://gg3.net/~chutz/gentoo/collisions |
10 |
>> |
11 |
>>I'll see to report them. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> |
14 |
> |
15 |
>My suggestion: |
16 |
> |
17 |
>Make sure that you've installed fresh from 2005.0, as there were tons of |
18 |
>collisions caused by files from the older stage1 and stage2 tarballs |
19 |
>that have been fixed since 2005.0, where we changed how the stage |
20 |
>tarballs worked. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> |
23 |
> |
24 |
Hi, |
25 |
Can confirm that (much less collisons with 2005.0), but as there exist |
26 |
some persistant collisions (nvidia-kernel, alsa-driver, some perl |
27 |
modules, etc.) So i've put these in package.features/package.env file |
28 |
(from Portage-Toys tools) to disable "collision-protect" just for them. |
29 |
Also thinking about again begin using "maketest" and do the same for |
30 |
failing packages, but not sure as there were quite a bit of packages |
31 |
that didn't pass the "tests". |
32 |
HTH. Rumen |
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |