1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>It's worth noting that a GLEP author need not be a dev, so those |
4 |
>people, of course, would always require a surrogate to submit/revise |
5 |
>GLEPs. As for devs being able to upload/revise GLEPs, I'm not opposed. |
6 |
>The reason that devs cannot update their own GLEPs right now is purely |
7 |
>technical: the GLEP page is part of the www tree, and that tree has |
8 |
>fairly strict permissions. If opening up the GLEP directory isn't too |
9 |
>much of a pita for infra, I certainly won't oppose it. I would still |
10 |
>prefer that GLEPs be run by one of the editors before being posted, |
11 |
>since we may be able to help, but I wouldn't insist on it. I would be |
12 |
>very sad, though, if people took advantage of a more liberal policy to |
13 |
>post poorly-thought-out junk. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
I agree with the GLEPs being run by one or several editors, i think |
17 |
it will keep the proposals very organized among them, something important |
18 |
for the whole glep.g.o structure. |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |