| 1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:19 am, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'm thinking about adding bsdmk to main tree and make ash/csh use it to |
| 3 |
> find pmake |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
considering the number of packages that use pmake, why do you want an eclass |
| 6 |
for it ? i'd say just put the logic in the ebuilds themselves |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> 'pmake' seems to be the old name of 'emake' (at least reading a couple of |
| 9 |
> comments here and there) and both csh and ash ebuilds wants to |
| 10 |
> call /usr/bin/pmake directly.. I'm not sure if bsdmk eclass should add |
| 11 |
> the /usr/bin bit or not. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
i double checked that pmake crap a while ago ... current stable/unstable |
| 14 |
should be purged of it (i know unstable is for sure) ... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
so check to see if stable portage installs a pmake symlink |
| 17 |
in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ ... if it doesnt, then you should be safe just |
| 18 |
calling `pmake` |
| 19 |
-mike |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives