| 1 |
On 13/10/16 10:13 AM, Raymond Jennings wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Fernando Rodriguez |
| 3 |
> <cyklonite@×××××.com <mailto:cyklonite@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 10/04/2016 06:24 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > This would actually be another reason to get rid of grub-0, if it can't |
| 8 |
> > build on one of our profiles, it will more than likely never be fixed |
| 9 |
> > upstream because they are now focused on grub-2.x. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> grub-0 is 32-bit software. You could build it without multilib but |
| 12 |
> you need |
| 13 |
> the dependencies like any other package (and link them |
| 14 |
> statically). And there |
| 15 |
> are other packages on the tree that don't build on all profiles. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> USE="abi_x86_32" |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> ? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Yes, that's how it's supported on multilib. Note though it still |
| 23 |
needs a multilib profile in order to have an abi_x86_32 libc; |
| 24 |
grub-static exists to support systems where there is no abi_x86_32 |
| 25 |
libc installed, such as those systems using the no-multilib profile. |
Archives