1 |
On Monday 14 July 2003 11:25, Tal Peer wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> While discussing the state of the php-cvs package on #gentoo_dev, lu_zero |
5 |
> suggested that we open a new category 'app-cvs' and move all -cvs packages |
6 |
> there. That way we don't litter all the categories with -cvs ebuilds that |
7 |
> most of users don't need/want. |
8 |
|
9 |
I don't like this idea. As others have said here, it defeats the purpose of |
10 |
categories as app groups. Also, there are many ebuilds most users don't need/ |
11 |
want, but I wouldn't define them as litter. I don't see that -cvs ebuilds in |
12 |
various categories interfere with users in any way, and they make it easy to |
13 |
see which packages have -cvs counterparts and which only have -cvs versions, |
14 |
since they are listed together. |
15 |
|
16 |
Finally, some of us write cvs ebuilds that don't have -cvs extensions :-) |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Dan Armak |
20 |
Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) |
21 |
Matan, Israel |
22 |
Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key |
23 |
Fingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 |