1 |
Dnia 2014-06-30, o godz. 17:40:16 |
2 |
James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> I've read that some heavy users of db, such as sks, work better with 5.3 |
5 |
> than they did with older versions. But upgrading needs to be done with care. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> So it should be fine to unmask 5.3 and slowly update reverse |
8 |
> dependencies to depend on 5.3 instead of whichever 4.x they currently |
9 |
> demand. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Unmasking the earlier 5.x releases seems unnecessary, though. |
12 |
|
13 |
While at it, please don't unmask <5.3.28-r1 (EAPI<5 ebuilds). Multilib |
14 |
relies heavily on not having anything EAPI<5 over 4.8.30-r1. |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Best regards, |
18 |
Michał Górny |