1 |
On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark |
4 |
> > Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The |
5 |
> > probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not |
6 |
> > so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch |
7 |
> > teams have problems keeping up. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> I think the same should be extended to other languages such as Perl |
10 |
> and Python (unless they have portions which are C/C++) |
11 |
|
12 |
Sounds like we could benefit from the "noarch" approach known in the RPM |
13 |
world, such that all these packages can also be immediately keyworded |
14 |
and stabilised for all arches. Would greatly simplify things for a |
15 |
great deal of packages, maybe? |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Fabian Groffen |
20 |
Gentoo on a different level |