| 1 |
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 08:56:01 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 16 January 2015 18:29:08 hasufell wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Patrick Lauer: |
| 4 |
> > > On 01/16/15 23:26, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
> > >> Patrick Lauer (patrick): |
| 6 |
> > >>> patrick 15/01/16 04:16:55 |
| 7 |
> > >>> |
| 8 |
> > >>> Modified: ChangeLog |
| 9 |
> > >>> Added: libuv-1.2.1.ebuild |
| 10 |
> > >>> Log: |
| 11 |
> > >>> Bump |
| 12 |
> > >> |
| 13 |
> > >> I expect people to ask me for review if they bump any of my packages. |
| 14 |
> > >> That includes QA team members. |
| 15 |
> > > |
| 16 |
> > > Are you always in such a bad mood? |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Do you, as QA team member, think that a review workflow improves quality? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> No. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Bureaucracy does not improve quality by itself. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
This is not a formal bureaucracy, there are some rules to behave in |
| 25 |
community and these rules are supposed to be equal for everyone: |
| 26 |
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/ebuild-maintenance/index.html |
| 27 |
"Touching other developers ebuilds". |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
The fact that developer with QA team member mandate (even if it was |
| 30 |
not used in this case) intentionally violates this policy without |
| 31 |
even considering this action as something abnormal is very |
| 32 |
disturbing. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Best regards, |
| 35 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives