| 1 |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Berntsen |
| 2 |
<alexander@××××××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 7 |
>> My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be |
| 8 |
>> unique. |
| 9 |
> orc is shorter and more punny (nice excuse for designing an orcish cow |
| 10 |
> mascot). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> On 11/12/13 22:04, William Hubbs wrote:> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at |
| 13 |
> 10:47:49PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
| 14 |
>>> are you going to rename also rc-service and rc-update? |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> No, there isn't a need for that, just "rc". |
| 17 |
> Please rename all of them, to provide uniform naming. This way, typing |
| 18 |
> orc, and tab-tabing in BASH will give you a list of orc-related |
| 19 |
> executables, just like with rc now. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
That makes no sense; there is almost no reason to manually invoke the |
| 23 |
"rc" binary currently, an Gentoo users are already familiar with names |
| 24 |
like "rc-update" and "service". |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Renaming everything just forces users to learn new command names for no reason. |
Archives