Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Little respect towards Daniel please
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:10:35
Message-Id: 20070305180245.GA3593@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Little respect towards Daniel please by Steve Long
1 On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:25:31PM +0000, Steve Long wrote:
2 > Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
3 >
4 > > Maybe if Ciaran recognized his past faults, begged pardon and promised
5 > > to be kinder from now and on, everything would be easier for everyone,
6 > > everything would calm down.
7 > >
8 > I share your dream ;)
9 >
10 > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
11 > >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:15:36 -0500 "William L. Thomson Jr."
12 > >> <wltjr@g.o> wrote:
13 > >>> So I we can cut him some slack, and we should all have some level of
14 > >>> respect, at least in public, towards the father, creator, and founder
15 > >>> of Gentoo.
16 > >>
17 > >> What kind of response do you think anyone else would have received had
18 > >> they started repeatedly attacking a project when they didn't even know
19 > >> what that project was, repeatedly tried to interfere with the
20 > >> management of a project when they don't know who is involved with or
21 > >> managing said project, repeatedly posted all kinds of outright lies
22 > >> after having been told that something was untrue and repeatedly resorted
23 > >> to ad hominem attacks in a technical discussion?
24 > >>
25 > Bloody hell where did all that come from? Am I missing something, cos I
26 > certainly haven't seen that on the dev m-l. Maybe it's a core/ irc thing,
27 > but afaic in the public domain drobbins hasn't done the above.
28
29 drobbins has repeatedly claimed that PMS is not a Gentoo project, that
30 Ciaran is leading PMS, that Ciaran's involvement with PMS requires
31 developer status, that Gentoo projects require Gentoo copyright, and
32 more. Having read some of his past and later messages, I don't doubt his
33 intentions are good, but from this thread alone I initially got the same
34 impression Ciaran did, except I did not see any actual ad hominem's from
35 drobbins's side, myself. I did see Ciaran asking drobbins to stop with
36 them in reply to what he apparently considered one.

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Little respect towards Daniel please Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>