1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> > Making constructive suggestions instead of others that can be |
3 |
> > easily interpreted as whims is the way to go. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Uh huh, and that's what I've been doing the whole time when I've |
6 |
> been asking for a patch for PMS, a GLEP etc. |
7 |
.. |
8 |
> requests for a better description we're supposed to be looking at |
9 |
|
10 |
No, this isn't really constructive. As I wrote, try to drive the |
11 |
discussion by adding substance to it, rather than fueling flames |
12 |
by requesting others to refine. |
13 |
|
14 |
Since it is an area where you may be able to contribute, I think |
15 |
it would be great if you did! |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
> are being met with complaints that we haven't magically done all |
19 |
> of the remaining work |
20 |
|
21 |
I think you're right that complaints are about your response, but I |
22 |
absolutely do not interpret the complaints to be that you personally |
23 |
or the PMS team did not implement the requested feature. I think |
24 |
that's a misunderstanding of yours. |
25 |
|
26 |
If you don't understand something of what thus far has been written, |
27 |
then why not ask specific questions to fill those gaps, and move on? |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
//Peter |