Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Parag Mehta <pm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] additional files in portage tree
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 11:25:59
Message-Id: 20010808112559.A7542@cvs.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] additional files in portage tree by Ben Lutgens
1 Hi Ben!
2
3 * Ben Lutgens assembled some ascibets to say:
4 Ben >Hi all, I am proposing we add a new file to the portage tree directories. I
5 Ben >was thinking something like the pkg_descr files in freebsd ports. It could
6 Ben >have a slightly more detailed description, the install process ( from the
7 Ben >portage point of view ) as well as homepage and ftp urls and possibly a
8 Ben >brief gentoo-changelog. It could look something like this.
9 Ben >I just think it'd be nice to have a file that we can less to find out what
10 Ben >a package is, sometimes the name isn't enough as I can't possibly keep
11 Ben >straight everything and the DESCRIPTION in the ebuild isn't great since
12 Ben >noone wants to clutter everything up.
13 Ben >
14 Ben >I'm also not suggesting we take the next 3 months to write these for the
15 Ben >existing packages, just adding them for new ones or possibly when updating.
16
17 I'm all for it.
18
19 also it would be nice if it could be interactive in way that when :
20
21 emerge foo.ebuild
22 it shows the pkg_descr()
23 thenruns the emerge --pretend foo.ebuild
24 and then asks the user whether to go ahead or not ?
25
26 and the user can bypass the interactivity by passing one more parameter as :
27 emerge --nopretend foo.ebuild
28
29 which shows the pkg_descr()
30 and then goes ahead and merges the pkg.
31
32 best regards,
33
34 pm
35 --
36 Developer <pm@g.o>
37 Gentoo Linux http://gentoo.org
38
39 #exclude <windows.h>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] additional files in portage tree Dan Armak <danarmak@g.o>