| 1 |
On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>> On the plus side it would be much easier to find duplicate bugs |
| 4 |
>>> since |
| 5 |
>>> the titles would be uniform. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I think this is an interesting point. I'd like to have something |
| 8 |
>> like a |
| 9 |
>> specialised bug system for ebuilds, where you have to enter the |
| 10 |
>> package |
| 11 |
>> category, package name, package version and where the bug happens |
| 12 |
>> (configure, compile, test, install, execution). |
| 13 |
<snip /> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Everyone has good ideas, no one has a good implementation. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> aka, implement it :P |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
I'm not that familiar with bugzilla. The easiest way could be to haev |
| 20 |
just another field like the email field for caterory/packagename (or |
| 21 |
with specific version if it is not a general bug) and another one for |
| 22 |
the ebuild phase in which the bug occured. I don't know how flexible |
| 23 |
bugzilla is with such modifications. Maybe some infra people could |
| 24 |
comment on this? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Philipp |
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives