| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
That means an ebuild *could* modify the live filesystem during the |
| 5 |
compile/install stages? That could be bad... |
| 6 |
Anyone know if there's a reason no overlayfs has been created yet? LiveCDs |
| 7 |
(Knoppix) have wanted this for quite a while and using it for a chrooted |
| 8 |
install of ebuilds would be nice too. Is there some reason that would make it |
| 9 |
hard to create? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
On Monday 22 September 2003 06:40 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 12 |
> > Doesn't the sandbox work by intercepting glibc calls? What I'm proposing |
| 13 |
> > is intercepting those same calls, changing the filename, and running the |
| 14 |
> > actual glibc code with the new filename... |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> It does, but it doesn't work with static binaries or binaries that don't |
| 17 |
> use glibc for their calls, and can cause problems. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Paul |
| 20 |
- -- |
| 21 |
Luke-Jr |
| 22 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
iD8DBQE/b6U8Zl/BHdU+lYMRAuYkAJ9NVrVFUmmh158SFVgu3491heS1ygCfRHO7 |
| 28 |
M5ggFw68SaW32Zri0qGzHXU= |
| 29 |
=j+PP |
| 30 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives