1 |
El mar, 20-09-2011 a las 15:16 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: |
2 |
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:09:01 +0200 |
3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > I haven't ever tried it but, what would occur if that people with |
6 |
> > really updated systems simply unpack an updated stage3 tarball in |
7 |
> > their / and, later, try to update? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Possibly at least few file collisions, if portage would be able to |
10 |
> clean the initial mess up. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> But maybe a solution is to fork a minimalistic installer/updater from |
13 |
> portage which would have really tiny needs, unpack stage3 like you |
14 |
> suggested and then clean up remaining files from replaced packages. |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Maybe we could tell that people to temporally disable protect-owned |
18 |
FEATURE until update ends :-| |