1 |
On Saturday 20 September 2008 18:15:27 Alexis Ballier wrote: |
2 |
> I can think of checks like: |
3 |
> - foo is a dep/rdep of bar |
4 |
> - foo has a "plugin like" architecture |
5 |
> - bar will "work" with minimal foo |
6 |
> - most people will expect some features in bar that come with foo's |
7 |
> plugins |
8 |
> - we might want to display warnings for the most useful features |
9 |
> - having useflags in bar for each of foo's useflags doesn't seem wise |
10 |
|
11 |
If you mean something like |
12 |
|
13 |
built_with_use cat/foo coolfeature || ewarn "bar will be more useful if |
14 |
you rebuild cat/foo with USE=coolfeature" |
15 |
|
16 |
then you can use |
17 |
|
18 |
has_version 'cat/foo[coolfeature]' || ... |
19 |
|
20 |
instead. |
21 |
|
22 |
> By the way, how will the --missing option of built_with_use be handled |
23 |
> by eapi 2? |
24 |
|
25 |
Not at all. |