1 |
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:27:26 -0400, Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> Lately it seems that both devs and non-devs are getting into the |
3 |
> top-posting habit on this mailing list. If you're not familiar with |
4 |
> what I mean, here is an example. |
5 |
> |
6 |
|
7 |
> |
8 |
> This is an annoying habit. It's traditional on mailing lists to quote |
9 |
> only the text to which you're replying, and put your reply below the |
10 |
|
11 |
> Please observe this rule when posting to this mailing list. For more |
12 |
> information, see |
13 |
> |
14 |
> http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s3-9 |
15 |
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
Unfortunate but true, but my experience with those who top-post (based |
19 |
on lengthy threads on gentoo-user and other lists) is that top-posters |
20 |
are addicted to their habit and will not be dissuaded by logic or |
21 |
appeals to netiquette. "I'll g-damn top-post if I want to," seems to |
22 |
be the attitude. It's something akin to trying to teach a pig to dance |
23 |
- you become covered with mud and it upsets the pig. |
24 |
|
25 |
Ah well, perhaps the developers are a better example than the general populace. |
26 |
|
27 |
It doesn't help that most mailer programs (mozilla is an exception) |
28 |
automatically position the cursor in a reply for top-posting leaving |
29 |
all the garbage that you must trim below, out of sight, and easy to |
30 |
forget. |
31 |
|
32 |
Thanks for the reminder. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
/\/\ |
36 |
(CR) Collins Richey |
37 |
\/\/ "I hear you're single again." "Spouse 2.0 had fewer bugs than |
38 |
Spouse 1.0, but the maintenance ... was too much for my OS." |
39 |
- Glitch (tm) |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |