| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:39:21AM +0200, Fernando J. Pereda wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 12 Jun 2008, at 04:16, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >Why the exherbo/paludis/PMS folk decided to go this route to report, |
| 6 |
> >I'm not quite sure aside from assuming they're just griefers. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> s-exherbo/paludis/PMS-pkgcore-g and: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> http://fpereda.wordpress.com/2008/05/03/on-cooperating-and-paludis-vulnerability/ |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Except this one wasn't a lie. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I wish there were more cooperation between all of us. But looks like |
| 15 |
> it is impossible with some of your people. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
While patrick hosts meatoo for pythonhead, that doesn't mean patrick |
| 18 |
can speak for meatoo. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The same applies for pkgcore. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Basically, I don't hold paludis devs responsible for their users |
| 23 |
behaviour (probably should considering the behaviour, but regardless). |
| 24 |
I do however hold paludis devs responsible for their *own* behaviour- |
| 25 |
and in this particular case, it *was* said devs commiting the |
| 26 |
offense. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Deflection aside, dropping the issue- I've made my point that it was |
| 29 |
serious crap behaviour and hardly in the spirit of cooperation (let |
| 30 |
alone QA). |
| 31 |
~harring |
Archives