| 1 |
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 15:20, Philippe Lafoucrière wrote: |
| 2 |
> totally agree ! Btw, gnumeric speed is related to version apparently, |
| 3 |
> and they didn't use the official gentoo (patched) kernel ("The same |
| 4 |
> 2.4.21 source was copied to all machines"). This sux !! |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Well i don't think this sucks, keeping at least consistency on the |
| 7 |
kernel between the 3 distributions is a good idea. Now, that being said, |
| 8 |
they seriously fsck'd up the rest of the test and optimisations. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I don't use specific gentoo kernels on my boxes, this is a personal |
| 11 |
choice made about a year ago and actually since 2.6, i don't use 2.4 |
| 12 |
anymore on personal machines (my laptop and my workstation). |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Steph |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Mail sent on Gentoo 1.4rc3 k2.6-test3 AMD 2600+ |
| 17 |
http://frlinux.net - frlinux@×××××××.net |
| 18 |
http://gentoofr.org - Portail Francais sur Gentoo Linux |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives