| 1 |
On 04/10/2010 11:17 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10 April 2010 21:27, Denis Dupeyron <calchan@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Ben, |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> Petteri was proposing an idea. He is being creative |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> You call that creative? It seems you don't know what the word means. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You don't have to take any part in the experiment but will you benefit |
| 11 |
anything by posting a negatively toned comment to this thread? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I guess I was hallucinating that I started the wiki project, which has |
| 15 |
> been a popular request for as long as I can remember. I guess I |
| 16 |
> imagined I worked together with Markos to start the proxy-maintainer |
| 17 |
> project to improve visibility of that option to contribute. And I must |
| 18 |
> have been dreaming that I sent a mail about forming a team to review |
| 19 |
> and renew the recruitment process and curriculum. I must be mistaken |
| 20 |
> in thinking I have proposed to centralize all developer documentation |
| 21 |
> into one place. Oh, and forgive me for not publicly announcing that I |
| 22 |
> sent a mail to the dormant webteam about joining and offering my help. |
| 23 |
> And asking for leadership on issues that affect Gentoo on a wider |
| 24 |
> scale is not constructive? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Yes all valuable contributions and hopefully you keep on that road. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> To my knowledge there was no public announcement about that, other |
| 31 |
> than that we have another lead now. |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Because there's not much to announce. You expect us to announce that are |
| 35 |
trying to be effective now? I don't think we tried to be inefficient |
| 36 |
earlier. The only thing changed visible to outside is lining our policy |
| 37 |
to agree with GLEP 48. It's the job of the lead to make sure the project |
| 38 |
does it's work as it's supposed to. |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Regards, |
| 41 |
Petteri |
Archives